Tait v. Muir and Others [1904] ScotLR 41_407 (11 March 1904)

Tait v. Muir and Others [1904] ScotLR 41_407 (11 March 1904)

A judicial factor has the sole title to sue for reduction of resolutions affecting the estate, regardless of whether those resolutions predate his appointment, especially where the factor is appointed due to mismanagement or misappropriation by prior managers.

Citation
[1904] ScotLR 41_407
Parties
Pursuer/respondent: John Scott Tait, C.A., Judicial Factor on the estate of the Incorporation of Tailors, Edinburgh; Defender/reclaimer: Mrs Emily Sophia Jackson or Muir and others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
11 March 1904
Procedural Posture
Action of Reduction / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
Outcome
appeal dismissed; judgment of Lord Ordinary adhered to
Legal Topics
Judicial Factor's Title to Sue, Reduction of Resolutions, Widows' Fund, Incorporation Governance
Trusts and Estates Corporate Law Civil Procedure Judicial Factor's Title to Sue Reduction of Resolutions Widows' Fund Incorporation Governance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Scott Tait, C.A., Judicial Factor on the estate of the Incorporation of Tailors, Edinburgh

Pursuer/respondent

Mrs Emily Sophia Jackson or Muir and others

Defender/reclaimer

Procedural Posture

Action of Reduction / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a judicial factor has title to sue for reduction of resolutions passed prior to his appointment
  2. 2 Whether the resolutions admitting Mrs Muir to the widows' fund were illegal

Ratio Decidendi

A judicial factor has the sole title to sue for reduction of resolutions affecting the estate, regardless of whether those resolutions predate his appointment, especially where the factor is appointed due to mismanagement or misappropriation by prior managers.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; judgment of Lord Ordinary adhered to

Orders

  • The Court adhered to the interlocutor of Lord Ordinary decerning against Mrs Muir in terms of the conclusions of the summons.