Love v. Love and Others [1907] ScotLR 649 (19 March 1907)
The Scottish Court of Session has jurisdiction over disputes concerning heritable property situated in Scotland, even if the defender is resident abroad, because only the Scottish courts can determine rights and effect transfers relating to such property.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 649
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Mrs Margaret Marshall or Love; Defender/reclaimer: Andrew Love; Defenders: Others (called for interest)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Declarator / Inner House, First Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Defender's plea of no jurisdiction repelled; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; proof allowed before answer regarding the third bond.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction Over Foreign Resident, Heritable Property, Married Women's Property Rights, Bonds and Dispositions in Security
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Margaret Marshall or Love
Pursuer/respondent
Andrew Love
Defender/reclaimer
Others (called for interest)
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Declarator / Inner House, First Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scottish Court of Session has jurisdiction over a dispute concerning heritable property in Scotland when the defender is resident abroad
- 2 Whether the pursuer is entitled to deal with bonds and dispositions in security over Scottish heritage without her husband's consent
Ratio Decidendi
The Scottish Court of Session has jurisdiction over disputes concerning heritable property situated in Scotland, even if the defender is resident abroad, because only the Scottish courts can determine rights and effect transfers relating to such property.
Court Disposition
Defender's plea of no jurisdiction repelled; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; proof allowed before answer regarding the third bond.
Orders
- Declarator granted in pursuer's favour regarding the first two bonds and dispositions in security.
- Proof allowed before answer regarding the third bond.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment