Cook v. Bonnybridge Silica and Fireclay Co. Ltd [1910] ScotLR 243 (08 November 1910)
Section 31 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907 applies only to actions by employees against employers; as this action was by the father of a deceased employee, section 31 did not apply and the order for jury trial in the Sheriff Court was incompetent. The proper course was to proceed with proof as previously allowed.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 243
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Alexander Cook; Defender/appellant: Bonnybridge Silica and Fireclay Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court Interlocutors to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; interlocutors subsequent to 1st July 1910 recalled; interlocutor of 1st July 1910 affirmed; case remitted to Sheriff to proceed with proof; no expenses due in regard to the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Jury Trial, Sheriff Courts (scotland) Act 1907, Employers' Liability Act 1880, Wrongful Death, Master and Servant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander Cook
Pursuer/respondent
Bonnybridge Silica and Fireclay Company Limited
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court Interlocutors to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an action by the father of a deceased employee against the employer qualifies as an 'action by an employee against his employer' under section 31 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907 for jury trial in the Sheriff Court.
- 2 Whether the pursuer is entitled to a jury trial in the Sheriff Court under section 31 or must proceed under section 30.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 31 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907 applies only to actions by employees against employers; as this action was by the father of a deceased employee, section 31 did not apply and the order for jury trial in the Sheriff Court was incompetent. The proper course was to proceed with proof as previously allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; interlocutors subsequent to 1st July 1910 recalled; interlocutor of 1st July 1910 affirmed; case remitted to Sheriff to proceed with proof; no expenses due in regard to the appeal.
Orders
- Recall interlocutors dated 7th July 1910 and 2nd August 1910.
- Affirm interlocutor of 1st July 1910 allowing proof.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment