Campbell v. Osborne & Hunter [1913] ScotLR 503 (08 March 1913)
The Court held that the order for trial at the sittings should be discharged and the cause remitted to the Lord Ordinary, implicitly accepting the procedural requirements as set by the rolls and declining to override them without explicit opinion.
- Citation
- [1913] ScotLR 503
- Parties
- Pursuer: Henry Campbell; Defenders: Osborne & Hunter
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 1913
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages / Motion for Inclusion in Trial List; Interlocutor Issued
- Outcome
- order for trial at sittings discharged; cause remitted to Lord Ordinary
- Legal Topics
- Jury Trial, Transmission of Cause, Act of Sederunt, Lodging Papers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Henry Campbell
Pursuer
Osborne & Hunter
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages / Motion for Inclusion in Trial List; Interlocutor Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's papers were lodged timeously under section 3 of the Act of Sederunt November 19, 1910
- 2 Whether the note appended to the rolls of Court could impose a stricter deadline than the Act of Sederunt
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the order for trial at the sittings should be discharged and the cause remitted to the Lord Ordinary, implicitly accepting the procedural requirements as set by the rolls and declining to override them without explicit opinion.
Court Disposition
order for trial at sittings discharged; cause remitted to Lord Ordinary
Orders
- Discharged the order for trial at the sittings in the ensuing vacation
- Remitted the cause to the Lord Ordinary to proceed as accords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment