McCormack v CSC Forest Products Ltd [2001] ScotCS 244 (1 November 2001)
Special cause was established to withhold the case from jury trial due to the complexity introduced by multiple and interlocking grounds of fault, insufficient specification of damages, and the complicated nature of the claims for physical and psychological injury, as well as statutory claims under sections 8 and 9 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 244
- Parties
- Pursuer: Inglis McCormack; Defender: CSC Forest Products Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Procedure Roll Hearing on Suitability for Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Special cause established; case withheld from jury trial and to proceed by proof.
- Legal Topics
- Jury Trial, Special Cause, Negligence, Statutory Duty, Damages, Loss of Earnings, Psychological Injury, Ogden Tables
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inglis McCormack
Pursuer
CSC Forest Products Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Procedure Roll Hearing on Suitability for Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special cause exists to withhold the case from jury trial
- 2 Complexity of pleadings and damages claims
- 3 Adequacy of specification in damages claims
Ratio Decidendi
Special cause was established to withhold the case from jury trial due to the complexity introduced by multiple and interlocking grounds of fault, insufficient specification of damages, and the complicated nature of the claims for physical and psychological injury, as well as statutory claims under sections 8 and 9 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982.
Court Disposition
Special cause established; case withheld from jury trial and to proceed by proof.
Orders
- Case to proceed by proof rather than jury trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment