Labacianskas v Labacianskas [1949] ScotCS CSIH_2 (15 February 1949)
The evidence was insufficient to establish that the husband had abandoned his Scottish domicile of choice at the date he was last heard of; the presumption of continuance of domicile applies, and the burden of proving abandonment was not discharged. Therefore, the Scottish court had jurisdiction to grant the dissolution of marriage.
- Citation
- [1949] ScotCS CSIH_2
- Parties
- Petitioner: Labacianskas; Respondent: Labacianskas
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 1949
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Dissolution of Marriage / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Before the First Division
- Outcome
- petition granted; Lord Ordinary's decision reversed
- Legal Topics
- Domicile, Presumption of Death, Divorce Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Labacianskas
Petitioner
Labacianskas
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Dissolution of Marriage / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Before the First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner's husband had abandoned his Scottish domicile of choice prior to his disappearance
- 2 Whether the Scottish court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition for dissolution of marriage based on the husband's domicile at the relevant date
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was insufficient to establish that the husband had abandoned his Scottish domicile of choice at the date he was last heard of; the presumption of continuance of domicile applies, and the burden of proving abandonment was not discharged. Therefore, the Scottish court had jurisdiction to grant the dissolution of marriage.
Court Disposition
petition granted; Lord Ordinary's decision reversed
Orders
- Decree of dissolution of marriage granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment