Foster v. The Keeper Of The Registers Of Scotland & Anor [2006] ScotCS CSOH_65 (02 May 2006)
The court cannot grant reduction of entries in the Land Register where rectification would prejudice a proprietor in possession, as precluded by section 9 of the Land Registration (Scotland) Act 1979; statutory remedies must be exhausted and judicial review is incompetent for the remedy sought.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_65
- Parties
- Petitioner: Susan Foster; First Respondent: The Keeper of the Registers of Scotland; Second Respondent: Robert Graham Carson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Petition / First Hearing, Competency Determination
- Outcome
- petition dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Land Registration, Rectification, Indemnity, Judicial Review, Statutory Remedies, Boundary Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Foster
Petitioner
The Keeper of the Registers of Scotland
First Respondent
Robert Graham Carson
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Petition / First Hearing, Competency Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether entries in the Land Register may be reduced via judicial review
- 2 Whether the court can grant reduction where rectification would prejudice a proprietor in possession
- 3 Whether statutory remedies must be exhausted before judicial review is competent
Ratio Decidendi
The court cannot grant reduction of entries in the Land Register where rectification would prejudice a proprietor in possession, as precluded by section 9 of the Land Registration (Scotland) Act 1979; statutory remedies must be exhausted and judicial review is incompetent for the remedy sought.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- first plea-in-law for each respondent sustained
- petition dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment