Todd v. Bowie [1902] ScotLR 39_307 (17 January 1902)
Abandonment of lease by tenant due to landlord's failure to repair fences did not constitute determination of tenancy under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Acts, as the lease was not terminated by effluxion of time, mutual agreement, or a fundamental breach; tenant's remedy was damages, not rescission.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_307
- Parties
- Landlord: James Todd; Tenant: William Bowie
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of Court of Session Inner House First Division
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; question answered in the negative
- Legal Topics
- Lease Termination, Breach of Contract, Rescission, Agricultural Holdings (scotland) Act 1883
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Todd
Landlord
William Bowie
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of Court of Session Inner House First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether abandonment of lease by tenant constitutes 'determination of tenancy' under Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Acts 1883–1900
- 2 Whether breach of landlord's obligation to repair fences entitles tenant to rescind lease
Ratio Decidendi
Abandonment of lease by tenant due to landlord's failure to repair fences did not constitute determination of tenancy under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Acts, as the lease was not terminated by effluxion of time, mutual agreement, or a fundamental breach; tenant's remedy was damages, not rescission.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; question answered in the negative
Orders
- Court answered special case question in the negative; lease not determined under statute
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment