Todd v. Bowie [1902] ScotLR 39_307 (17 January 1902)

Todd v. Bowie [1902] ScotLR 39_307 (17 January 1902)

Abandonment of lease by tenant due to landlord's failure to repair fences did not constitute determination of tenancy under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Acts, as the lease was not terminated by effluxion of time, mutual agreement, or a fundamental breach; tenant's remedy was damages, not rescission.

Citation
[1902] ScotLR 39_307
Parties
Landlord: James Todd; Tenant: William Bowie
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
17 January 1902
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of Court of Session Inner House First Division
Outcome
appeal allowed; question answered in the negative
Legal Topics
Lease Termination, Breach of Contract, Rescission, Agricultural Holdings (scotland) Act 1883

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Todd

Landlord

William Bowie

Tenant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment of Court of Session Inner House First Division

  1. 1 Whether abandonment of lease by tenant constitutes 'determination of tenancy' under Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Acts 1883–1900
  2. 2 Whether breach of landlord's obligation to repair fences entitles tenant to rescind lease

Ratio Decidendi

Abandonment of lease by tenant due to landlord's failure to repair fences did not constitute determination of tenancy under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Acts, as the lease was not terminated by effluxion of time, mutual agreement, or a fundamental breach; tenant's remedy was damages, not rescission.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; question answered in the negative

Orders

  • Court answered special case question in the negative; lease not determined under statute