Jenkins v. Gascoigne [1907] ScotLR 861 (13 July 1907)
Once the lease was terminated and the tenant was no longer in occupation, a remit to a man of skill to inspect the fences would serve no useful purpose, as any remaining dispute was limited to damages and not to ongoing repair obligations. The summary application procedure was therefore inapplicable and incompetent in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 861
- Parties
- Pursuer: William Jenkins; Defender: Colonel Gascoigne
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court (summary Application) / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lease Termination, Repair of Fences, Summary Application, Competency of Remit to Man of Skill
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Jenkins
Pursuer
Colonel Gascoigne
Defender
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (summary Application) / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a remit to a man of skill to inspect and report on the condition of farm fences is competent after the lease has been terminated by the landlord exercising a break clause.
- 2 Whether the summary application procedure is appropriate in the circumstances where the tenant is no longer in occupation except for a small portion.
Ratio Decidendi
Once the lease was terminated and the tenant was no longer in occupation, a remit to a man of skill to inspect the fences would serve no useful purpose, as any remaining dispute was limited to damages and not to ongoing repair obligations. The summary application procedure was therefore inapplicable and incompetent in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- petition dismissed
- no remit to man of skill granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment