Magistrates of Kilmarnock v. Donald & Morton [1900] ScotLR 37_417 (14 February 1900)
Auctioneers who are not owners or in charge of cattle at the time of entry into the burgh are not personally liable for petty customs. The right to levy such customs is against the person bringing the goods into the burgh, and there is no legal basis to compel auctioneers to disclose business records to facilitate municipal claims against third parties.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_417
- Parties
- Pursuer: Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of the Burgh of Kilmarnock; Defender: Donald & Morton
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled in part; proof allowed only on limited averment; otherwise, pursuers' claims found irrelevant and insufficient in law; pursuers (appellants) found liable in expenses of appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Levy of Petty Customs, Liability for Municipal Dues, Auctioneer Liability, Production of Documents, Burden of Proof in Municipal Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of the Burgh of Kilmarnock
Pursuer
Donald & Morton
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether auctioneers (defenders) are personally liable for petty customs on cattle brought for sale within the burgh
- 2 Whether defenders can be compelled to produce lists or books to identify third-party consignors for municipal claims
Ratio Decidendi
Auctioneers who are not owners or in charge of cattle at the time of entry into the burgh are not personally liable for petty customs. The right to levy such customs is against the person bringing the goods into the burgh, and there is no legal basis to compel auctioneers to disclose business records to facilitate municipal claims against third parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled in part; proof allowed only on limited averment; otherwise, pursuers' claims found irrelevant and insufficient in law; pursuers (appellants) found liable in expenses of appeal.
Orders
- Proof allowed to pursuers on averment that cattle were brought for sale within the burgh by defenders.
- All other conclusions of the summons dismissed as irrelevant and insufficient in law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment