PETITION OF GREENE KING LTD AND OTHERS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE TIED PUBS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2021 [2022] ScotCS CSOH_89 (09 December 2022)
The Tied Pubs (Scotland) Act 2021 does not relate to the reserved matter of competition under the Scotland Act 1998, as its purpose is to regulate contractual fairness between landlords and tied-pub tenants, not the competitive structure of the market. The Act is not incompatible with A1P1 rights, as any...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] ScotCS CSOH_89
- Parties
- Petitioner: Greene King Limited; Petitioner: Hawthorn Leisure Limited; Petitioner: Punch Taverns Limited; Respondent: Lord Advocate (Scottish Government)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Substantive Hearing at First Instance
- Outcome
- Petition refused
- Legal Topics
- Legislative Competence, Devolution, Competition Law, Property Rights, Contractual Fairness, Judicial Review
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greene King Limited
Petitioner
Hawthorn Leisure Limited
Petitioner
Punch Taverns Limited
Petitioner
Lord Advocate (Scottish Government)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Substantive Hearing at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tied Pubs (Scotland) Act 2021 is outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament as relating to the reserved matter of competition under the Scotland Act 1998
- 2 Whether the Act is incompatible with Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights (A1P1) regarding peaceful enjoyment of possessions
Ratio Decidendi
The Tied Pubs (Scotland) Act 2021 does not relate to the reserved matter of competition under the Scotland Act 1998, as its purpose is to regulate contractual fairness between landlords and tied-pub tenants, not the competitive structure of the market. The Act is not incompatible with A1P1 rights, as any proportionality assessment is premature until the code is drafted, and the Act pursues a legitimate objective. The petitioners' challenge fails on both grounds.
Court Disposition
Petition refused
Orders
- Third and fourth pleas-in-law for the respondent sustained
- Petition refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment