M v Murray, Mental Health Officer, East Ayrshire Social Work Department & Ors [2009] ScotSC 8 (17 April 2009)
The second medical report, when read as a whole and in context, met the statutory requirements of sections 57 and 58 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. The Tribunal was entitled to make the interim compulsory treatment order. The expiry of the order before the appeal hearing did not render the appeal incompetent, as useful clarification of the law was served. The appeal was refused and the Tribunal's decision upheld.
- Citation
- [2009] ScotSC 8
- Parties
- Appellant: M; First Respondent: Chris Murray, Mental Health Officer, East Ayrshire Social Work Department; Second Respondent: Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland; Third Respondent: Dr Nicola Hodelet, Responsible Medical Officer for the Appellant
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Interim Compulsory Treatment Order Under the Mental Health (care and Treatment) (scotland) Act 2003 / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; Tribunal's decision upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Treatment Orders, Mental Health Tribunal Procedure, Statutory Interpretation, Medical Evidence Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Appellant
Chris Murray, Mental Health Officer, East Ayrshire Social Work Department
First Respondent
Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland
Second Respondent
Dr Nicola Hodelet, Responsible Medical Officer for the Appellant
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Interim Compulsory Treatment Order Under the Mental Health (care and Treatment) (scotland) Act 2003 / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for an interim compulsory treatment order was misconceived due to alleged non-compliance of the second medical report with statutory requirements under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003
- 2 Whether the appeal was competent given the expiry of the interim order
Ratio Decidendi
The second medical report, when read as a whole and in context, met the statutory requirements of sections 57 and 58 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. The Tribunal was entitled to make the interim compulsory treatment order. The expiry of the order before the appeal hearing did not render the appeal incompetent, as useful clarification of the law was served. The appeal was refused and the Tribunal's decision upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; Tribunal's decision upheld.
Orders
- No expenses due to or by any party in respect of the appeal.
- Cause certified as suitable for the employment of counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment