MARK McINALLY v PROCURATOR FISCAL, EDINBURGH [2016] ScotSAC Crim 5 (7 April 2016)
The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law or in the exercise of discretion in refusing bail, as the statutory criteria were properly considered.
- Citation
- [2016] ScotSAC Crim 5
- Parties
- Appellant: Mark McInally; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Edinburgh
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mark McInally
Appellant
Procurator Fiscal, Edinburgh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing bail to the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the sheriff had not erred in law or in the exercise of discretion in refusing bail, as the statutory criteria were properly considered.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment