Fowler v. Hughes [1903] ScotLR 40_321 (23 January 1903)
A single receipt for 12s. 6d., not explained or read to the pursuer, does not constitute sufficient evidence of election to take compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, nor does it bar the pursuer's action for damages at common law or under the Employers Liability Act 1880.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_321
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: William Fowler; Defender/respondent: John Hughes
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
- Outcome
- appeal sustained; interlocutor recalled; action allowed to proceed
- Legal Topics
- Master and Servant, Workmen's Compensation, Election to Take Compensation, Bar to Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Fowler
Pursuer/appellant
John Hughes
Defender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer elected to take compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, thereby barring his action for damages at common law or under the Employers Liability Act 1880
Ratio Decidendi
A single receipt for 12s. 6d., not explained or read to the pursuer, does not constitute sufficient evidence of election to take compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897, nor does it bar the pursuer's action for damages at common law or under the Employers Liability Act 1880.
Court Disposition
appeal sustained; interlocutor recalled; action allowed to proceed
Orders
- Repel the first plea-in-law for the defender.
- Remit the cause to the Sheriff to proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment