Stevenson v. North British Railway Co. [1905] ScotLR 42_768 (18 July 1905)
The contract between Stevenson and North British Railway Company was of an annual nature, tacitly renewed each year, and could not be terminated by three months' notice once the year had commenced; the pursuer was entitled to salary for the full year ending 31st October 1901.
- Citation
- [1905] ScotLR 42_768
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: D. M. Stevenson; Defender/appellant: North British Railway Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1905
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; judgment for pursuer affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Master and Servant, Agent and Principal, Tacit Relocation, Termination of Employment, Annual Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. M. Stevenson
Pursuer/respondent
North British Railway Company
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employment contract was terminable by three months' notice or was subject to tacit relocation for a yearly term
- 2 Whether the pursuer was entitled to salary for the full year ending 31st October 1901
Ratio Decidendi
The contract between Stevenson and North British Railway Company was of an annual nature, tacitly renewed each year, and could not be terminated by three months' notice once the year had commenced; the pursuer was entitled to salary for the full year ending 31st October 1901.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; judgment for pursuer affirmed
Orders
- Defenders to pay pursuer £320, 16s. 8d. as salary for period 31st March to 31st October 1901
- Interest to run from 31st October 1901
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment