Percy v. Donaldson Brothers [1908] ScotLR 199 (27 November 1908)
The relationship of master and servant had ended when the pursuer finished his work and left the employer's premises; the subsequent journey to collect wages did not prolong the employment relationship. Therefore, the doctrine of common employment did not apply to bar the pursuer's claim for damages.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 199
- Parties
- Pursuer: David Percy; Defenders: Donaldson Brothers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
- Outcome
- Sheriff-Substitute's interlocutor recalled; case remitted for proof.
- Legal Topics
- Master and Servant, Common Employment, Termination of Employment, Personal Injury, Employer's Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Percy
Pursuer
Donaldson Brothers
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the relationship of master and servant continued after the pursuer ceased work and left the employer's premises but before receiving wages
- 2 Whether the doctrine of common employment applied to bar the pursuer's claim for damages
Ratio Decidendi
The relationship of master and servant had ended when the pursuer finished his work and left the employer's premises; the subsequent journey to collect wages did not prolong the employment relationship. Therefore, the doctrine of common employment did not apply to bar the pursuer's claim for damages.
Court Disposition
Sheriff-Substitute's interlocutor recalled; case remitted for proof.
Orders
- The interlocutor of the Sheriff-Substitute is recalled.
- The case is remitted to the Sheriff Court for probation (proof).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment