APPEAL IN THE CAUSE MD v JM [2020] ScotSAC Civ 25 (15 December 2020)
The sheriff did not err in law or in the exercise of discretion; the welfare of the child was properly considered and justified refusal of contact.
- Citation
- [2020] ScotSAC Civ 25
- Parties
- Appellant: MD; Respondent: JM
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contact Orders, Child Welfare, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
MD
Appellant
JM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sheriff erred in refusing contact between the appellant and the child
- 2 Whether the welfare of the child was properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff did not err in law or in the exercise of discretion; the welfare of the child was properly considered and justified refusal of contact.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order for contact between appellant and child
- No expenses awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment