(FIRST) WILLIAM RODDIE and (SECOND) SPECTRUM PROPERTIES (SCOTLAND) Ltd against ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS Ltd [2015] ScotCS CSOH_30 (26 March 2015)
The article is not capable of bearing the defamatory meanings contended for by the pursuers. The reasonable reader would interpret the article as an attack on Clyde Gateway, not as an allegation of ongoing criminal conduct by the first pursuer or as rendering the second pursuer a poor credit risk. The references to 'convicted fraudster' are factual and do not imply continuing criminal enterprise. The pursuers' averments of malice are irrelevant and lack specification. The defenders' first plea in law is sustained and the action dismissed.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSOH_30
- Parties
- Pursuer: William Roddie; Pursuer: Spectrum Properties (Scotland) Limited; Defender: Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation Action / Procedure Roll Discussion, Motion to Dismiss
- Outcome
- action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Meaning of Defamatory Statements, Spent Convictions, Malice, Fair Comment, Qualified Privilege, Reynolds Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Roddie
Pursuer
Spectrum Properties (Scotland) Limited
Pursuer
Associated Newspapers Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Defamation Action / Procedure Roll Discussion, Motion to Dismiss
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the article published by the defenders was capable of bearing the defamatory meanings contended for by the pursuers
- 2 Whether the article implied ongoing criminal conduct by the first pursuer
- 3 Whether the article rendered the second pursuer a poor credit risk due to being run by a fraudster
Ratio Decidendi
The article is not capable of bearing the defamatory meanings contended for by the pursuers. The reasonable reader would interpret the article as an attack on Clyde Gateway, not as an allegation of ongoing criminal conduct by the first pursuer or as rendering the second pursuer a poor credit risk. The references to 'convicted fraudster' are factual and do not imply continuing criminal enterprise. The pursuers' averments of malice are irrelevant and lack specification. The defenders' first plea in law is sustained and the action dismissed.
Court Disposition
action dismissed
Orders
- defenders' first plea in law sustained
- action dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment