Patterson v Landsberg [1905] ScotCS CSIH_1 (24 May 1905)

Patterson v Landsberg [1905] ScotCS CSIH_1 (24 May 1905)

The court found that the defenders had actively misrepresented the character and provenance of the articles, inducing the pursuer to purchase them as antiques when they were in fact modern fabrications. This constituted fraudulent misrepresentation, entitling the pursuer to rescind the contracts and recover the sums paid.

Citation
[1905] ScotCS CSIH_1
Parties
Pursuer: Patterson; Defender: Landsberg & Son
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
24 May 1905
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note)
Outcome
judgment for the pursuer
Legal Topics
Misrepresentation, Rescission of Contract, Fraudulent Sale, Warranty in Sale of Goods
Contract Law Sale of Goods Fraud Misrepresentation Rescission of Contract Fraudulent Sale Warranty in Sale of Goods

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patterson

Pursuer

Landsberg & Son

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Note)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sales of certain articles were induced by fraudulent misrepresentation by the sellers
  2. 2 Whether the pursuer is entitled to rescind the contracts and recover the purchase price

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defenders had actively misrepresented the character and provenance of the articles, inducing the pursuer to purchase them as antiques when they were in fact modern fabrications. This constituted fraudulent misrepresentation, entitling the pursuer to rescind the contracts and recover the sums paid.

Court Disposition

judgment for the pursuer

Orders

  • Reduction of the sales of the three articles in question
  • Repayment to the pursuer of the sums paid for the articles