Gorman v. Hughes [1907] ScotLR 44_309 (15 January 1907)
Where a pursuer raises an action in the Court of Session for a sum far exceeding what he could reasonably expect to recover, and the actual damages awarded are well below the Court's jurisdictional threshold, the Court may modify the pursuer's expenses to one-half, as the action should have been raised in the Sheriff Court.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 44_309
- Parties
- Pursuer: Frederick L. Gorman; Defender: George Hughes
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Damages Action (personal Injury) / Post Verdict Motion on Expenses
- Outcome
- Pursuer awarded one-half of taxed expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Modification of Expenses, Jurisdictional Competence, Damages Assessment, Jury Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frederick L. Gorman
Pursuer
George Hughes
Defender
Procedural Posture
Damages Action (personal Injury) / Post Verdict Motion on Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer is entitled to full expenses when the damages awarded are far below the Court of Session threshold
- 2 Whether the action should have been raised in the Sheriff Court instead of the Court of Session
Ratio Decidendi
Where a pursuer raises an action in the Court of Session for a sum far exceeding what he could reasonably expect to recover, and the actual damages awarded are well below the Court's jurisdictional threshold, the Court may modify the pursuer's expenses to one-half, as the action should have been raised in the Sheriff Court.
Court Disposition
Pursuer awarded one-half of taxed expenses.
Orders
- Pursuer entitled to one-half of the taxed amount of his expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment