Ahmad v HM Advocate [2011] ScotHC HCJAC_16 (26 January 2011)
It is not equitable or in the interests of justice to allow the proposed amendment to the grounds of appeal at this late stage, given the delay, the absence of satisfactory explanation, and the implications for the progress of the case. The application is refused both under section 100 of the Scotland Act 1998 and as a matter of judicial discretion.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotHC HCJAC_16
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohammed Ahmad; Respondent: Her Majesty's Advocate
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence / Application for Leave to Amend Grounds of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend grounds of appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Proceeds of Crime, Right to Legal Representation, Appeal Procedure, Devolution Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammed Ahmad
Appellant
Her Majesty's Advocate
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence / Application for Leave to Amend Grounds of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend grounds of appeal to include Cadder v HM Advocate arguments
- 2 Whether the proposed amendment is time-barred under section 100 of the Scotland Act 1998
- 3 Whether it is equitable or in the interests of justice to allow the amendment at this stage
Ratio Decidendi
It is not equitable or in the interests of justice to allow the proposed amendment to the grounds of appeal at this late stage, given the delay, the absence of satisfactory explanation, and the implications for the progress of the case. The application is refused both under section 100 of the Scotland Act 1998 and as a matter of judicial discretion.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend grounds of appeal refused.
Orders
- Refuse application for leave to amend grounds of appeal.
- Refuse to receive the devolution issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment