Mr Y and Scottish Ministers [2018] ScotIC 084_2018 (18 June 2018)

The Scottish Ministers failed to comply with their statutory duty to respond to the applicant's request within the required timescale under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2018] ScotIC 084_2018
Parties: Applicant: Mr Y; Respondent: Scottish Ministers
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judgment Date: 18 June 2018
Procedural Posture: Freedom of Information Appeal / Decision
Outcome: application upheld
Legal Topics: Statutory Time Limits, Failure to Respond, Public Authority Obligations

Administrative Law Freedom of Information Statutory Time Limits Failure to Respond Public Authority Obligations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr Y

Applicant

Scottish Ministers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Freedom of Information Appeal / Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Scottish Ministers failed to respond to a freedom of information request within the statutory timescale

Ratio Decidendi

The Scottish Ministers failed to comply with their statutory duty to respond to the applicant's request within the required timescale under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.

Court Disposition

application upheld

Orders

The Scottish Ministers are required to respond to the applicant's request for information in accordance with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.