Cran v. Watt [1901] ScotLR 38_593 (17 May 1901)
The statutory requirement of notice 'for two successive weeks' is satisfied by publication in a newspaper on any day of one week and again on any day of the following week; a seven-day interval is not required. The Town Council's notice, published on Friday and the following Wednesday, complied with section 145 of the Aberdeen Municipality Extension Act 1871. The assessment imposed on the defender is valid.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 38_593
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: Peter Macleod Cran; Defender/respondent: John Watt junior
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Substitute to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; defender's plea repelled; cause remitted to Sheriff-Substitute
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Assessments, Statutory Notice Requirements, Construction of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Macleod Cran
Pursuer/appellant
John Watt junior
Defender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Sheriff Substitute to Court of Session Inner House Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice published by the Town Council satisfied the statutory requirement under section 145 of the Aberdeen Municipality Extension Act 1871 for notice 'in at least one of the newspapers published in the city for two successive weeks'.
- 2 Whether insufficient notice, if found, would invalidate the assessment imposed on the defender.
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory requirement of notice 'for two successive weeks' is satisfied by publication in a newspaper on any day of one week and again on any day of the following week; a seven-day interval is not required. The Town Council's notice, published on Friday and the following Wednesday, complied with section 145 of the Aberdeen Municipality Extension Act 1871. The assessment imposed on the defender is valid.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; defender's plea repelled; cause remitted to Sheriff-Substitute
Orders
- Interlocutor appealed against recalled
- Fourth plea-in-law for defender repelled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment