N.D.M.C. v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2014] ScotHJ HJCAC_12 (29 January 2013)
No devolution issue was argued or determined; the sheriff was entitled to refuse the petition for an identification parade as it was presented too late; the procedure was superseded by postponement of the trial diet.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotHJ HJCAC_12
- Parties
- Applicant: NDMC; Respondent: Her Majesty's Advocate
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Bill of Advocation / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Identification Parade, Article 6 ECHR, Devolution Issue, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NDMC
Applicant
Her Majesty's Advocate
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bill of Advocation / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal to hold an identification parade breached Article 6 ECHR
- 2 Whether the sheriff's refusal was a valid exercise of discretion
- 3 Whether a devolution issue was properly raised
Ratio Decidendi
No devolution issue was argued or determined; the sheriff was entitled to refuse the petition for an identification parade as it was presented too late; the procedure was superseded by postponement of the trial diet.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal to the United Kingdom Supreme Court is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment