Greenlees v. The Royal Hotel, Dundee, Ltd [1905] ScotLR 42_317 (12 January 1905)

Greenlees v. The Royal Hotel, Dundee, Ltd [1905] ScotLR 42_317 (12 January 1905)

The pursuer's averments, taken as a whole, disclosed a relevant case of fault against the defenders, including inadequate lighting, improper lift construction, and lack of warning. The deceased's actions did not amount to an admission of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The case should proceed to a jury for determination of fault and contributory negligence.

Citation
[1905] ScotLR 42_317
Parties
Pursuer: Mrs Flora Clark or Greenlees; Defender: The Royal Hotel, Dundee, Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
12 January 1905
Procedural Posture
Civil (reparation/damages) / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Dismissal at First Instance
Outcome
Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proposed issue approved; case to proceed to jury.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Duty of Care, Hotel Liability, Lift Accidents
Tort Personal Injury Occupiers' Liability Negligence Contributory Negligence Duty of Care Hotel Liability Lift Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Flora Clark or Greenlees

Pursuer

The Royal Hotel, Dundee, Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil (reparation/damages) / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Dismissal at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer's averments disclosed relevant grounds of fault against the defenders for the death of the deceased.
  2. 2 Whether the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence barring recovery.

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer's averments, taken as a whole, disclosed a relevant case of fault against the defenders, including inadequate lighting, improper lift construction, and lack of warning. The deceased's actions did not amount to an admission of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The case should proceed to a jury for determination of fault and contributory negligence.

Court Disposition

Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; proposed issue approved; case to proceed to jury.

Orders

  • Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor dismissing the action.
  • Approval of the proposed issue for jury trial.