Lunnie v. Glasgow and South Western Railway Co. [1906] ScotLR 43_372 (10 February 1906)
A master is not liable for injuries to a volunteer assisting a servant, caused by the negligence of another servant, as the volunteer is in the same position as a servant and the doctrine of common employment applies.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 43_372
- Parties
- Pursuer: Patrick Lunnie (administrator-at-law for William Lunnie); Defender: Glasgow and South Western Railway Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; interlocutor affirmed; defenders assoilzied
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Common Employment, Master and Servant, Liability for Acts of Servants, Volunteer Assistance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Lunnie (administrator-at-law for William Lunnie)
Pursuer
Glasgow and South Western Railway Company
Defender
Procedural Posture
Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a master liable for injuries to a volunteer assisting a servant, caused by the negligence of another servant?
- 2 Does the doctrine of common employment apply to a volunteer not formally employed by the master?
Ratio Decidendi
A master is not liable for injuries to a volunteer assisting a servant, caused by the negligence of another servant, as the volunteer is in the same position as a servant and the doctrine of common employment applies.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; interlocutor affirmed; defenders assoilzied
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Interlocutor appealed against affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment