Kennedy v. Bruce [1907] ScotLR 593 (20 March 1907)

Kennedy v. Bruce [1907] ScotLR 593 (20 March 1907)

Pursuer, not being party to lease nor having jus quaesitum tertio, cannot sue landlord on contract; however, action based on negligence is relevant and pursuer entitled to sue landlord if fault established under Scottish law.

Citation
[1907] ScotLR 593
Parties
Pursuer: Mrs Sarah M'Donald or Kennedy; Defender: John W. Bruce
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
20 March 1907
Procedural Posture
Reparation (damages) / Appeal From Sheriff Court; Interlocutor Pronounced
Outcome
First plea-in-law for pursuer repelled; cause remitted to Sheriff for proof before answer; all questions of expenses reserved
Legal Topics
Negligence, Landlord and Tenant, Title to Sue, Jus Quaesitum Tertio

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Sarah M'Donald or Kennedy

Pursuer

John W. Bruce

Defender

Procedural Posture

Reparation (damages) / Appeal From Sheriff Court; Interlocutor Pronounced

  1. 1 Whether a housekeeper, not party to lease, has title to sue landlord for damages caused by defective premises
  2. 2 Whether action based on contract or negligence is relevant for such claimant

Ratio Decidendi

Pursuer, not being party to lease nor having jus quaesitum tertio, cannot sue landlord on contract; however, action based on negligence is relevant and pursuer entitled to sue landlord if fault established under Scottish law.

Court Disposition

First plea-in-law for pursuer repelled; cause remitted to Sheriff for proof before answer; all questions of expenses reserved

Orders

  • Recall Sheriff-Substitute's interlocutor of 8 November 1906
  • Repel first plea for pursuer