Kennedy v. Bruce [1907] ScotLR 593 (20 March 1907)
Pursuer, not being party to lease nor having jus quaesitum tertio, cannot sue landlord on contract; however, action based on negligence is relevant and pursuer entitled to sue landlord if fault established under Scottish law.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 593
- Parties
- Pursuer: Mrs Sarah M'Donald or Kennedy; Defender: John W. Bruce
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (damages) / Appeal From Sheriff Court; Interlocutor Pronounced
- Outcome
- First plea-in-law for pursuer repelled; cause remitted to Sheriff for proof before answer; all questions of expenses reserved
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Landlord and Tenant, Title to Sue, Jus Quaesitum Tertio
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Sarah M'Donald or Kennedy
Pursuer
John W. Bruce
Defender
Procedural Posture
Reparation (damages) / Appeal From Sheriff Court; Interlocutor Pronounced
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a housekeeper, not party to lease, has title to sue landlord for damages caused by defective premises
- 2 Whether action based on contract or negligence is relevant for such claimant
Ratio Decidendi
Pursuer, not being party to lease nor having jus quaesitum tertio, cannot sue landlord on contract; however, action based on negligence is relevant and pursuer entitled to sue landlord if fault established under Scottish law.
Court Disposition
First plea-in-law for pursuer repelled; cause remitted to Sheriff for proof before answer; all questions of expenses reserved
Orders
- Recall Sheriff-Substitute's interlocutor of 8 November 1906
- Repel first plea for pursuer
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment