M'Caffery v. Lanarkshire Tramways Co. [1910] ScotLR 691 (23 March 1910)
There was no evidence led of failure to keep a proper look-out, failure to give warning, or excessive speed by the defenders' servant. Therefore, there was no case to go to the jury, and the judge was correct to withdraw the case.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 691
- Parties
- Pursuer: Thomas M'Caffery (as tutor and administrator-in-law for Teresa M'Caffery, a pupil child); Defender: Lanarkshire Tramways Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (damages) Action / Motion to Withdraw Case From Jury at Close of Pursuer's Evidence
- Outcome
- Verdict for the defenders; case withdrawn from jury for lack of evidence of fault.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Jury Trial, Withdrawal of Case From Jury, Evidence of Fault
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas M'Caffery (as tutor and administrator-in-law for Teresa M'Caffery, a pupil child)
Pursuer
Lanarkshire Tramways Company
Defender
Procedural Posture
Reparation (damages) Action / Motion to Withdraw Case From Jury at Close of Pursuer's Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient evidence of fault or negligence by the defenders or their servant to allow the case to go to the jury
- 2 Whether the judge was competent to withdraw the case from the jury for lack of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence led of failure to keep a proper look-out, failure to give warning, or excessive speed by the defenders' servant. Therefore, there was no case to go to the jury, and the judge was correct to withdraw the case.
Court Disposition
Verdict for the defenders; case withdrawn from jury for lack of evidence of fault.
Orders
- Jury directed to return a verdict for the defenders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment