Milligan v. Henderson [1915] ScotLR 813 (20 July 1915)
The defender was not liable because the dog was not shown to be vicious or dangerous, nor was there proof that the defender knew or ought to have known of any such propensity. Liability for injury by a domestic animal requires proof of scientia or fault, neither of which was established on the facts.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 813
- Parties
- Pursuer: Louisa Ann Milligan; Defender: James Henderson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House, Second Division
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; defender assoilzied (absolved) from liability
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Liability for Animals, Dangerous Animals, Scientia (knowledge of Propensity), Personal Injury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Louisa Ann Milligan
Pursuer
James Henderson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Reparation (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House, Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the owner or custodian of a dog liable for injury caused by the dog in the absence of knowledge of dangerous propensity (scientia)?
- 2 Does negligence arise from allowing a frolicsome but not vicious dog to follow a carriage on a public road?
Ratio Decidendi
The defender was not liable because the dog was not shown to be vicious or dangerous, nor was there proof that the defender knew or ought to have known of any such propensity. Liability for injury by a domestic animal requires proof of scientia or fault, neither of which was established on the facts.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; defender assoilzied (absolved) from liability
Orders
- Sustain the sixth plea-in-law for the defender
- Assoilzie the defender from the conclusions of the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment