M'Fadyen v. White [1921] ScotLR 329 (10 March 1921)
The pursuer's averments are relevant and disclose a case fit for inquiry; if the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the defender's breach of duty in permitting riotous conduct, liability may arise; the facts must be investigated by a jury.
- Citation
- [1921] ScotLR 329
- Parties
- Pursuer: John M'Fadyen; Defender: Mrs Margaret Smith Miller or White
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 1921
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (damages) / Appeal From Sheriff Court; Interlocutory Decision on Relevancy and Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Issue approved; case remitted for jury trial.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Liability of Licencee, Duty of Care, Breach of Statutory Duty, Relevancy of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John M'Fadyen
Pursuer
Mrs Margaret Smith Miller or White
Defender
Procedural Posture
Reparation (damages) / Appeal From Sheriff Court; Interlocutory Decision on Relevancy and Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the licencee of a public-house is liable for injuries to a customer caused by another customer during a brawl
- 2 Whether the pleadings disclose a relevant case for inquiry
- 3 Whether breach of licensing certificate constitutes negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's averments are relevant and disclose a case fit for inquiry; if the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the defender's breach of duty in permitting riotous conduct, liability may arise; the facts must be investigated by a jury.
Court Disposition
Issue approved; case remitted for jury trial.
Orders
- Remit case for trial by jury.
- Approve issue for trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment