M'Kinlay v. Darngavil Coal Co. [1922] ScotLR 553 (19 July 1922)
The pursuer's averments disclosed a relevant case for inquiry, as the defenders had knowledge of children playing near the gate, which was in disrepair and constituted a concealed danger. The issue of whether the defenders breached their duty of care should be determined by a jury.
- Citation
- [1922] ScotLR 553
- Parties
- Pursuer: George M'Kinlay; Defender: Darngavil Coal Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 1922
- Procedural Posture
- Reparation (damages) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Dismissal at First Instance
- Outcome
- Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; issue approved; case remitted for jury trial.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Occupier's Liability, Concealed Trap, Duty of Care, Injuries to Children
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George M'Kinlay
Pursuer
Darngavil Coal Company, Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Reparation (damages) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Dismissal at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders owed a duty of care to prevent injury to children playing near a defective gate
- 2 Whether the gate constituted a concealed trap or allurement to children
- 3 Whether the pursuer's averments were relevant to establish negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's averments disclosed a relevant case for inquiry, as the defenders had knowledge of children playing near the gate, which was in disrepair and constituted a concealed danger. The issue of whether the defenders breached their duty of care should be determined by a jury.
Court Disposition
Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; issue approved; case remitted for jury trial.
Orders
- Recall of dismissal
- Approval of issue for jury
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment