Thorpe v. Aberdeen City Council [2007] ScotSC 29 (22 June 2007)
The defenders failed to exercise reasonable care in inspecting and maintaining the pavement, resulting in a dangerous defect that caused the pursuer's injury. The pursuer contributed to the accident by turning around immediately before the fall, justifying a 20% reduction in damages for contributory negligence.
- Citation
- [2007] ScotSC 29
- Parties
- Pursuer: Trevor Francis Thorpe; Defenders: Aberdeen City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- Decree for the pursuer, with damages reduced by 20% for contributory negligence.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Statutory Duty, Local Authority Liability, Personal Injury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trevor Francis Thorpe
Pursuer
Aberdeen City Council
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders were negligent and in breach of statutory duty in failing to repair the pavement
- 2 Whether the pursuer was contributorily negligent
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders failed to exercise reasonable care in inspecting and maintaining the pavement, resulting in a dangerous defect that caused the pursuer's injury. The pursuer contributed to the accident by turning around immediately before the fall, justifying a 20% reduction in damages for contributory negligence.
Court Disposition
Decree for the pursuer, with damages reduced by 20% for contributory negligence.
Orders
- Payment by the defenders to the pursuer of £10,000 sterling with interest at 8% per annum from date of decree until payment
- Defenders found liable to the pursuer in expenses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment