CAROL MCDONALD AGAINST DUNDEE CITY COUNCIL [2015] ScotSC 74 (14 December 2015)
The defenders did not breach their duty of care in providing the reference, which was true, fair, and accurate in the circumstances. The loss of employment was caused by the SSSC investigation, not the content or timing of the reference. There was no actionable negligence or loss attributable to the defenders' conduct.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotSC 74
- Parties
- Pursuer: Carol McDonald; Defender: Dundee City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Proof (trial) on Liability and Loss of Chance
- Outcome
- claim dismissed; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from first crave
- Legal Topics
- Negligent Reference, Duty of Care, Loss of Chance, Disciplinary Proceedings, Professional Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carol McDonald
Pursuer
Dundee City Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Proof (trial) on Liability and Loss of Chance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders breached their duty of care in providing a reference to a prospective employer.
- 2 Whether the pursuer suffered loss as a result of any alleged breach.
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders did not breach their duty of care in providing the reference, which was true, fair, and accurate in the circumstances. The loss of employment was caused by the SSSC investigation, not the content or timing of the reference. There was no actionable negligence or loss attributable to the defenders' conduct.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from first crave
Orders
- Second plea in law for defenders sustained.
- Defenders assoilzied from first crave of initial writ.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment