Ross v. Ross and Others [1920] ScotLR 461 (13 May 1920)
The appeal is competent because the petitioner invoked ordinary judicial procedure in the Sheriff Court, resulting in a final judgment including expenses, distinguishing this case from purely administrative acts; personal bar prevents the petitioner from objecting to appealability.
- Citation
- [1920] ScotLR 461
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Mrs Agnes Rodger Shannon or Ross; Defender/appellant: David Ross; Defender/appellant: George Ross; Defender/appellant: Alexander Nicholson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1920
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Objection to Competency of Appeal in Court of Session, Inner House, Second Division
- Outcome
- Objection to competency of appeal repelled; cause appointed to be put to the roll.
- Legal Topics
- Nomination of Arbiter, Competency of Appeal, Administrative Vs Judicial Acts, Expenses in Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Agnes Rodger Shannon or Ross
Pursuer/respondent
David Ross
Defender/appellant
George Ross
Defender/appellant
Alexander Nicholson
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Objection to Competency of Appeal in Court of Session, Inner House, Second Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the appeal against the Sheriff-Substitute's interlocutor appointing an arbiter and awarding expenses competent?
- 2 Does the nature of the Sheriff-Substitute's act (administrative or judicial) affect appealability?
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is competent because the petitioner invoked ordinary judicial procedure in the Sheriff Court, resulting in a final judgment including expenses, distinguishing this case from purely administrative acts; personal bar prevents the petitioner from objecting to appealability.
Court Disposition
Objection to competency of appeal repelled; cause appointed to be put to the roll.
Orders
- Objection to competency of appeal repelled
- Cause to be put to the roll
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment