McCue (Ap) v North Lanarkshire Council [2006] ScotCS CSOH_80 (19 May 2006)

McCue (Ap) v North Lanarkshire Council [2006] ScotCS CSOH_80 (19 May 2006)

The court found on the balance of probabilities that the pursuer's fall was caused by the poor condition of the footpath, for which the defenders were liable. The evidence did not support contributory negligence due to alcohol consumption. Damages for solatium were discounted by 20% to reflect the pursuer's pre-existing health conditions.

Citation
[2006] ScotCS CSOH_80
Parties
Pursuer: Neil McCue (A. P.); Defender: North Lanarkshire Council
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
19 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Judgment After Proof
Outcome
decree for pursuer
Legal Topics
Occupiers' Liability, Causation, Contributory Negligence, Quantum of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neil McCue (A. P.)

Pursuer

North Lanarkshire Council

Defender

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Judgment After Proof

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer's fall was caused by the poor condition of the footpath under the defenders' control
  2. 2 Whether alcohol consumption contributed to the accident (contributory negligence)
  3. 3 Assessment of damages, including solatium, in light of pre-existing conditions

Ratio Decidendi

The court found on the balance of probabilities that the pursuer's fall was caused by the poor condition of the footpath, for which the defenders were liable. The evidence did not support contributory negligence due to alcohol consumption. Damages for solatium were discounted by 20% to reflect the pursuer's pre-existing health conditions.

Court Disposition

decree for pursuer

Orders

  • Decree granted in favour of the pursuer for the sum of £65,080.