McCue (Ap) v North Lanarkshire Council [2006] ScotCS CSOH_80 (19 May 2006)
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the pursuer's fall was caused by the poor condition of the footpath, for which the defenders were liable. The evidence did not support contributory negligence due to alcohol consumption. Damages for solatium were discounted by 20% to reflect the pursuer's pre-existing health conditions.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_80
- Parties
- Pursuer: Neil McCue (A. P.); Defender: North Lanarkshire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- decree for pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Occupiers' Liability, Causation, Contributory Negligence, Quantum of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil McCue (A. P.)
Pursuer
North Lanarkshire Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's fall was caused by the poor condition of the footpath under the defenders' control
- 2 Whether alcohol consumption contributed to the accident (contributory negligence)
- 3 Assessment of damages, including solatium, in light of pre-existing conditions
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the pursuer's fall was caused by the poor condition of the footpath, for which the defenders were liable. The evidence did not support contributory negligence due to alcohol consumption. Damages for solatium were discounted by 20% to reflect the pursuer's pre-existing health conditions.
Court Disposition
decree for pursuer
Orders
- Decree granted in favour of the pursuer for the sum of £65,080.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment