Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police v. Sharp & Ors [A4715_99.htm] ScotCS 9 [2002] ScotSC 85 (15th March, 2002)

Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police v. Sharp & Ors [A4715_99.htm] ScotCS 9 [2002] ScotSC 85 (15th March, 2002)

The first defender failed to prove that the car was stolen or that his possession terminated in a manner precluding the second defender from acquiring ownership. Therefore, the presumption of ownership from possession applies, and the second defender is entitled to be ranked and preferred.

Citation
[2002] ScotSC 85
Parties
Pursuer: John Orr, Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police; First Defender: David William Sharp; Second Defender: Malcolm McLean McMillan; Defender: Norwich Union Insurance Ltd
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Procedural Posture
Multiple Poinding / Appeal
Outcome
Appeal sustained; sheriff's interlocutor recalled; second defender's claim ranked and preferred; first defender's claim repelled; all questions of expenses reserved.
Legal Topics
Ownership of Moveable Property, Presumption of Ownership, Onus of Proof, Good Faith Possession, Multiple Poinding
Property Law Civil Procedure Ownership of Moveable Property Presumption of Ownership Onus of Proof Good Faith Possession Multiple Poinding

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Orr, Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police

Pursuer

David William Sharp

First Defender

Malcolm McLean McMillan

Second Defender

Norwich Union Insurance Ltd

Defender

Procedural Posture

Multiple Poinding / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the second defender acquired good title to the car.
  2. 2 Whether the presumption of ownership from possession applies.
  3. 3 Whether the first defender lost title in a manner precluding the second defender from acquiring ownership.

Ratio Decidendi

The first defender failed to prove that the car was stolen or that his possession terminated in a manner precluding the second defender from acquiring ownership. Therefore, the presumption of ownership from possession applies, and the second defender is entitled to be ranked and preferred.

Court Disposition

Appeal sustained; sheriff's interlocutor recalled; second defender's claim ranked and preferred; first defender's claim repelled; all questions of expenses reserved.

Orders

  • Recall of sheriff's interlocutor dated 21 September 2001.
  • Deletion of finding in fact (68) and renumbering of findings.