Hutcheson v. Hoggan's Trustees [1904] ScotLR 41_408 (12 March 1904)

Hutcheson v. Hoggan's Trustees [1904] ScotLR 41_408 (12 March 1904)

Where a trust expressly directs trustees to apply income for maintenance and education of children with a separate estate, and the father advances sums for these purposes, he is entitled to reimbursement from accumulated income unless circumstances show waiver or animus donandi; mere delay in claiming does not bar...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1904] ScotLR 41_408
Parties
Pursuer: John Freeland Hutcheson; Defenders: Hoggan's Trustees
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
12 March 1904
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Outcome
appeal allowed; decree granted for pursuer
Legal Topics
Parental Obligation, Aliment, Trust Administration, Arrears of Maintenance
Family Law Trusts and Estates Parental Obligation Aliment Trust Administration Arrears of Maintenance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Freeland Hutcheson

Pursuer

Hoggan's Trustees

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Is a father entitled to reimbursement from trustees for sums expended in maintenance and education of children with a separate estate when trustees accumulated income instead of applying it as directed?
  2. 2 Does delay in claiming aliment bar reimbursement for arrears?

Ratio Decidendi

Where a trust expressly directs trustees to apply income for maintenance and education of children with a separate estate, and the father advances sums for these purposes, he is entitled to reimbursement from accumulated income unless circumstances show waiver or animus donandi; mere delay in claiming does not bar recovery if explained.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; decree granted for pursuer

Orders

  • Recall Lord Ordinary's interlocutor
  • Grant decree in terms of the conclusions of the action