PETITIONS OF AB AND XY FOR ORDERS UNDER SECTION 54 OF THE HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY ACT 2008 [2023] ScotCS CSOH_46 (13 July 2023)
The statutory 6-month time limit in section 54(3) of the 2008 Act is not an absolute bar to granting a parental order; a purposive and welfare-focused interpretation is required. Separated applicants can still be considered as living in an enduring family relationship if they demonstrate an unambiguous intention to co-parent and maintain family life. The children's home can be with both applicants even if they do not cohabit, provided the factual matrix supports this. The welfare of the children is paramount and supports granting the orders.
- Citation
- [2023] ScotCS CSOH_46
- Parties
- Petitioner: AB; Petitioner: XY
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Parental Order Under Section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- applications granted
- Legal Topics
- Parental Orders, Surrogacy, Statutory Interpretation, Child Welfare, Human Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Petitioner
XY
Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Petition for Parental Order Under Section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can grant a parental order under section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 when the application is made after the statutory 6-month time limit.
- 2 Whether separated applicants can be considered as 'living as partners in an enduring family relationship' under section 54(2)(c).
- 3 Whether the requirement that the child's home is with the applicants under section 54(4)(a) is satisfied when the applicants are separated.
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory 6-month time limit in section 54(3) of the 2008 Act is not an absolute bar to granting a parental order; a purposive and welfare-focused interpretation is required. Separated applicants can still be considered as living in an enduring family relationship if they demonstrate an unambiguous intention to co-parent and maintain family life. The children's home can be with both applicants even if they do not cohabit, provided the factual matrix supports this. The welfare of the children is paramount and supports granting the orders.
Court Disposition
applications granted
Orders
- Parental orders made in respect of G and H under section 54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment