SF against LE (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCAIR 49 (31 July 2025)

SF against LE (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCAIR 49 (31 July 2025)

It is not in the best interests of the child N to make any order granting the pursuer parental responsibilities and rights or contact, given the pursuer's history of domestic abuse, lack of relationship with the child, the defender's ongoing fear, the child's neurodevelopmental vulnerabilities, and the absence of any evidence that such orders would benefit N. The welfare principle and the need to protect from abuse outweigh the general presumption in favour of contact.

Citation
[2025] SCAIR 49
Parties
Pursuer: SF; Defender: LE
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
31 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil (family Law Parental Rights and Contact) / Final Judgment After Proof
Outcome
Defender's pleas sustained; pursuer's pleas refused; cause dismissed; no expenses due to or by either party.
Legal Topics
Parental Responsibilities and Rights, Child Contact, Domestic Abuse, Child Welfare, Non Harassment Orders
Family Law Child Law Parental Responsibilities and Rights Child Contact Domestic Abuse Child Welfare Non Harassment Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SF

Pursuer

LE

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil (family Law Parental Rights and Contact) / Final Judgment After Proof

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether it is in the best interests of the child to grant the pursuer parental responsibilities and rights and/or contact with the child
  2. 2 Whether the history of domestic abuse and the child's circumstances preclude such orders

Ratio Decidendi

It is not in the best interests of the child N to make any order granting the pursuer parental responsibilities and rights or contact, given the pursuer's history of domestic abuse, lack of relationship with the child, the defender's ongoing fear, the child's neurodevelopmental vulnerabilities, and the absence of any evidence that such orders would benefit N. The welfare principle and the need to protect from abuse outweigh the general presumption in favour of contact.

Court Disposition

Defender's pleas sustained; pursuer's pleas refused; cause dismissed; no expenses due to or by either party.

Orders

  • Sustains the defender's first and second pleas-in-law.
  • Refuses the pursuer's pleas-in-law.