SAN v. KJN [2014] ScotSC 16 (22 January 2014)
It is not in the best interests of the children to extinguish the defender's parental rights and responsibilities or to grant the pursuer unilateral right to change their surnames; regulation of parental rights and responsibilities by interdict and order is appropriate to secure the welfare of the children.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotSC 16
- Parties
- Pursuer and Minuter: SAN; Defender: KJN
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Parental Rights and Responsibilities Regulation / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Pleas in law for pursuer repelled; pleas in law for defender sustained; court regulates parental rights and responsibilities ex proprio motu; no expenses awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Rights and Responsibilities, Child Welfare, Change of Surname, Contact Orders, Interdicts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SAN
Pursuer and Minuter
KJN
Defender
Procedural Posture
Family Law Parental Rights and Responsibilities Regulation / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the defender's parental rights and responsibilities be extinguished?
- 2 Should the pursuer be granted unilateral right to change the children's surnames?
- 3 Should the court regulate parental rights and responsibilities by interdict and order?
Ratio Decidendi
It is not in the best interests of the children to extinguish the defender's parental rights and responsibilities or to grant the pursuer unilateral right to change their surnames; regulation of parental rights and responsibilities by interdict and order is appropriate to secure the welfare of the children.
Court Disposition
Pleas in law for pursuer repelled; pleas in law for defender sustained; court regulates parental rights and responsibilities ex proprio motu; no expenses awarded.
Orders
- Interdicts defender from seeking information about the children from schools or health professionals without written agreement of pursuer.
- Interdicts defender from initiating or attempting to initiate direct contact with the children without written agreement of pursuer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment