Gibson v Hunter Home Designs Ltd [1975] ScotCS CSIH_1 (07 November 1975)
The purchaser acquired only personal rights under the missives and had not received delivery of the disposition prior to liquidation; therefore, the property remained part of the company's heritable estate at the commencement of winding up and no trust was constituted in favour of the purchaser.
- Citation
- [1975] ScotCS CSIH_1
- Parties
- Purchaser: Mr Gibson; Seller/company in Liquidation: Hunter Home Designs Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 1975
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case Stated for the Opinion of the Court / Judgment After Hearing Legal Arguments
- Outcome
- The court answered the first question (that the subjects formed part of the property of the company at the commencement of winding up) in the affirmative, and the second and third questions (that the purchaser had acquired property or that the company was bound to deliver the disposition) in the negative.
- Legal Topics
- Passing of Property in Heritable Subjects, Effect of Liquidation on Contractual Obligations, Trusts and Personal Rights Under Missives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Gibson
Purchaser
Hunter Home Designs Limited
Seller/company in Liquidation
Procedural Posture
Special Case Stated for the Opinion of the Court / Judgment After Hearing Legal Arguments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether property in the subjects passed to the purchaser prior to liquidation
- 2 Whether the company held the subjects in trust for the purchaser
- 3 Whether the subjects formed part of the company's property at the commencement of winding up
Ratio Decidendi
The purchaser acquired only personal rights under the missives and had not received delivery of the disposition prior to liquidation; therefore, the property remained part of the company's heritable estate at the commencement of winding up and no trust was constituted in favour of the purchaser.
Court Disposition
The court answered the first question (that the subjects formed part of the property of the company at the commencement of winding up) in the affirmative, and the second and third questions (that the purchaser had acquired property or that the company was bound to deliver the disposition) in the negative.
Orders
- Subjects formed part of the property of the company for the purposes of the Companies Acts at the date of commencement of winding up.
- Subjects were not the property of the purchaser at that date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment