Sloans Dairies v Glasgow Corp [1977] ScotCS CSIH_2 (24 March 1977)
The risk of accidental damage to heritable property passes to the purchaser upon conclusion of a perfected contract of sale, regardless of whether a date of entry has been fixed. The buyer acquires a jus ad rem specificam at that point, and the absence of a fixed date of entry does not constitute a suspensive condition preventing the passing of risk. Responsibility for upkeep remains with the seller until entry but does not affect the legal incidence of risk.
- Citation
- [1977] ScotCS CSIH_2
- Parties
- Pursuer: Sloans Dairies Limited; Defender: Glasgow Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion)
- Outcome
- reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; proof before answer allowed on limited point
- Legal Topics
- Passing of Risk, Sale of Heritable Property, Contract Formation, Date of Entry, Damage to Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sloans Dairies Limited
Pursuer
Glasgow Corporation
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion)
Legal Issues
- 1 When does the risk of accidental damage pass from seller to buyer in a contract for the sale of heritable property?
- 2 Is a date of entry an essential term for a concluded contract of sale of heritage?
- 3 Does the absence of a fixed date of entry affect the passing of risk?
Ratio Decidendi
The risk of accidental damage to heritable property passes to the purchaser upon conclusion of a perfected contract of sale, regardless of whether a date of entry has been fixed. The buyer acquires a jus ad rem specificam at that point, and the absence of a fixed date of entry does not constitute a suspensive condition preventing the passing of risk. Responsibility for upkeep remains with the seller until entry but does not affect the legal incidence of risk.
Court Disposition
reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; proof before answer allowed on limited point
Orders
- Defenders' first and third pleas-in-law repelled
- Proof before answer allowed on pursuers' averment regarding willingness to give possession
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment