Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co., Ltd v. New Lamb Tyre Co., Ltd [1903] ScotLR 40_360 (17 February 1903)
A prior certificate of validity under section 31 entitles the pursuer to expenses as between agent and client in a subsequent infringement action, even if the validity of the patent is not disputed in the latter action.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_360
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company, Limited; Defender/reclaimer: New Lamb Tyre Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; motion for expenses as between agent and client granted
- Legal Topics
- Patent Infringement, Costs and Expenses, Certificate of Validity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company, Limited
Pursuer/respondent
New Lamb Tyre Company, Limited
Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuers are entitled to expenses as between agent and client under section 31 of the Patents, Designs, and Trade-Marks Act 1883, despite validity of patent not being disputed in the present action
Ratio Decidendi
A prior certificate of validity under section 31 entitles the pursuer to expenses as between agent and client in a subsequent infringement action, even if the validity of the patent is not disputed in the latter action.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; motion for expenses as between agent and client granted
Orders
- interdict granted as craved
- expenses as between agent and client awarded to pursuers
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment