Anderson, Re Petition of [2008] ScotCS CSOH_133 (10 September 2008)
It is reasonable to grant retrospective sanction to the liquidator as the funding arrangement with Hunter & Clark does not make them dominus litis, and the liquidator was justified in raising the action given the circumstances and lack of candour from the respondent.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSOH_133
- Parties
- Petitioner: Keith Veitch Anderson; Respondent: Paul Anthony Dickens; Respondent: Ablawen Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Court Sanction in Insolvency Proceedings / Application for Retrospective Court Sanction
- Outcome
- sanction granted with retrospective effect
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator's Powers, Court Sanction, Unfair Preference, Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up, Retrospective Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keith Veitch Anderson
Petitioner
Paul Anthony Dickens
Respondent
Ablawen Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Petition for Court Sanction in Insolvency Proceedings / Application for Retrospective Court Sanction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant retrospective sanction to the liquidator to raise unfair preference proceedings under Section 243 of the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether the funding of the action by a creditor (Hunter & Clark) affects the court's discretion to grant sanction
Ratio Decidendi
It is reasonable to grant retrospective sanction to the liquidator as the funding arrangement with Hunter & Clark does not make them dominus litis, and the liquidator was justified in raising the action given the circumstances and lack of candour from the respondent.
Court Disposition
sanction granted with retrospective effect
Orders
- Sanction granted to the liquidator to raise proceedings under Section 243 of the Insolvency Act 1986 with effect retrospective to 19 December 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment