Brandon Hire Plc v Russell [2010] ScotCS CSIH_76 (24 June 2010)
The clear and unambiguous wording of Section E, headed 'Guarantee' and expressly stating personal liability, imposed a binding personal guarantee on the appellant; the appellant is deemed to have read and accepted personal liability by signing.
- Citation
- [2010] ScotCS CSIH_76
- Parties
- Pursuers and Respondents: Brandon Hire Plc; Defender and Appellant: Steven Russell
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Sheriff's Decision Refusing to Admit Certain Averments to Probation
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Personal Guarantees, Director Liability, Construction of Contract Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brandon Hire Plc
Pursuers and Respondents
Steven Russell
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Sheriff's Decision Refusing to Admit Certain Averments to Probation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the wording of Section E of the application form imposed personal liability on the director for the company's debts
- 2 Whether sufficient notice was given to the director that he was signing a personal guarantee
Ratio Decidendi
The clear and unambiguous wording of Section E, headed 'Guarantee' and expressly stating personal liability, imposed a binding personal guarantee on the appellant; the appellant is deemed to have read and accepted personal liability by signing.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Orders
- Case remitted to the sheriff to proceed as accords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment