NATIONAL HOUSE BUILDING COUNCIL v JOHN PENMAN AND ELIZABETH PENMAN [2014] ScotCS CSOH_120 (01 August 2014)
There is no substantive defence to the claim as restricted to the 12 properties. The Penmans' arguments do not displace their liability under the personal guarantees, and issues regarding third parties, NHBC inspections, or financial hardship are not relevant defences to the claim.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotCS CSOH_120
- Parties
- Pursuer: National House Building Council; Defender: John Penman; Defender: Elizabeth Penman
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Decree (judgment on the Pleadings)
- Outcome
- summary decree granted for payment
- Legal Topics
- Personal Guarantees, Builder Liability, Remedial Works, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National House Building Council
Pursuer
John Penman
Defender
Elizabeth Penman
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Decree (judgment on the Pleadings)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr and Mrs Penman are liable under personal guarantees for the company's obligations to NHBC
- 2 Whether there is a substantive defence to the NHBC's claim for remedial costs
Ratio Decidendi
There is no substantive defence to the claim as restricted to the 12 properties. The Penmans' arguments do not displace their liability under the personal guarantees, and issues regarding third parties, NHBC inspections, or financial hardship are not relevant defences to the claim.
Court Disposition
summary decree granted for payment
Orders
- Summary decree granted against John Penman and Elizabeth Penman for payment of £300,550.06 to NHBC.
- NHBC to inform the court within one month whether it intends to proceed with claims relating to properties at 1, 32 and 36 Lyoncross.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment