Ellison v. Inspirations East [2002] ScotCS 289 (01 November 2002)

Ellison v. Inspirations East [2002] ScotCS 289 (01 November 2002)

The accident was caused solely by the fault of the lorry driver. The coach driver acted reasonably, slowed down, and was not negligent in failing to stop or drive onto the hard standing, as such action would have posed greater risks. The defenders are not liable for the pursuer's injuries.

Citation
[2002] ScotCS 289
Parties
Pursuer: Linda Georgina Ellison; Defender: Inspirations East Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Proof Restricted to Liability
Outcome
decree of absolvitor granted
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Holiday Contract Liability, Negligence, Vicarious Liability
Tort Contract Personal Injury Holiday Contract Liability Negligence Vicarious Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Linda Georgina Ellison

Pursuer

Inspirations East Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Action / Proof Restricted to Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defenders (holiday company) are liable for injuries sustained by the pursuer in a coach accident in Turkey under contract or tort principles
  2. 2 Whether the coach driver was negligent and contributed to the accident

Ratio Decidendi

The accident was caused solely by the fault of the lorry driver. The coach driver acted reasonably, slowed down, and was not negligent in failing to stop or drive onto the hard standing, as such action would have posed greater risks. The defenders are not liable for the pursuer's injuries.

Court Disposition

decree of absolvitor granted

Orders

  • Action dismissed; defenders absolved of liability