Cain v Procurator Fiscal, Perth [2010] ScotHC HCJAC_131 (15 December 2010)

Cain v Procurator Fiscal, Perth [2010] ScotHC HCJAC_131 (15 December 2010)

The imposition of a custodial sentence and an 8-year disqualification were justified due to the appellant's third conviction for drink driving, high blood alcohol level, and re-offending shortly after licence restoration; societal interests outweighed personal mitigation.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] ScotHC HCJAC_131
Parties
Appellant: Peter Cain; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Perth
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
15 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal refused
Legal Topics
Drink Driving, Sentencing, Disqualification, Custodial Sentence, Community Service
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Drink Driving Sentencing Disqualification Custodial Sentence Community Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Cain

Appellant

Procurator Fiscal, Perth

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the imposition of a custodial sentence and the length of disqualification were excessive for repeat drink driving offences

Ratio Decidendi

The imposition of a custodial sentence and an 8-year disqualification were justified due to the appellant's third conviction for drink driving, high blood alcohol level, and re-offending shortly after licence restoration; societal interests outweighed personal mitigation.

Court Disposition

appeal refused

Orders

  • Custodial sentence of 175 days imprisonment upheld
  • Disqualification from holding a driving licence for 8 years upheld