Arthur & Anor v Arthur [2004] ScotSC 80 (01 December 2004)

Arthur & Anor v Arthur [2004] ScotSC 80 (01 December 2004)

A Minute seeking appointment as guardian does not require compliance with section 57 of the Act; the court may appoint any suitable consenting individual as guardian, regardless of whether they were a party to the original application or have lodged reports.

Citation
[2004] ScotSC 80
Parties
Pursuer: John James Arthur; Respondent: Peter Paul Arthur; Adult: Mrs Margaret Arthur; Financial Guardian: Cecilia Brough
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
01 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Application for Guardianship Under Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000 / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Outcome
Application granted in part; appointments made as per interlocutor.
Legal Topics
Guardianship, Adults With Incapacity, Appointment of Guardian, Procedural Competency
Family Law Mental Health Law Guardianship Adults With Incapacity Appointment of Guardian Procedural Competency

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John James Arthur

Pursuer

Peter Paul Arthur

Respondent

Mrs Margaret Arthur

Adult

Cecilia Brough

Financial Guardian

Procedural Posture

Application for Guardianship Under Adults With Incapacity (scotland) Act 2000 / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a competing application for guardianship by Minute must comply with section 57 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000
  2. 2 Whether the court may appoint as guardian a person not originally party to the process or nominated in the application

Ratio Decidendi

A Minute seeking appointment as guardian does not require compliance with section 57 of the Act; the court may appoint any suitable consenting individual as guardian, regardless of whether they were a party to the original application or have lodged reports.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; appointments made as per interlocutor.

Orders

  • Defences for the respondent withdrawn
  • Minute number 5 of Process withdrawn