Ward v. Walker [1920] ScotLR 121 (26 November 1920)
A pupil without guardians may bring an action in his own name, and the judge should appoint a curator ad litem to validate the proceedings. The Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 does not exclude this practice, and the action should proceed accordingly.
- Citation
- [1920] ScotLR 121
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter Ward junior; Respondent: Gideon Walker
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 1920
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; action to proceed with appointment of curator ad litem.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Title to Sue, Minor and Pupil, Appointment of Curator Ad Litem
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Ward junior
Appellant
Gideon Walker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a pupil without guardians can bring an action in his own name and have a curator ad litem appointed
- 2 Whether the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 creates any specialty excluding this practice
Ratio Decidendi
A pupil without guardians may bring an action in his own name, and the judge should appoint a curator ad litem to validate the proceedings. The Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 does not exclude this practice, and the action should proceed accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; action to proceed with appointment of curator ad litem.
Orders
- Sheriff-Substitute as arbitrator to appoint a tutor ad litem to the appellant.
- Action not dismissed; allowed to proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment